• 网站首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 绘图要求
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

用户登录

  • 作者登录
  • 审稿登录
  • 编辑登录
  • 读者登录

在线期刊

  • 当期目次

  • 过刊浏览

  • Email Alert

  • RSS

  • 文章点击排行

  • 文章下载排行

下载专区

  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊列表(2021—2022年度)

  • 2018年中国科技核心期刊目录(自然科学卷)

  • 标点符号用法

  • 《地球环境学报》绘图要求

  • 《地球环境学报》征稿简则

  • 2017年中国科技核心期刊目录(自然科学卷)

  • 2016年中国科技核心期刊目录 (自然科学卷)

  • 国标文献著录格式

友情链接

  • 中国科学院
  • 国家自然科学基金委员会
  • 中华人民共和国科学技术部
  • 中国科学院地球环境研究所
  • 中国科学院地球环境研究所...
引用本文:王丽琴,李博伟,黄 宇,何世恒,薛永刚,曹军骥.2016.环境中挥发性有机物监测及分析方法[J].地球环境学报,(2):130-139
WANG Liqin, LI Bowei, HUANG Yu, HO Steven Sai Hang, XUE Yonggang, CAO Junji.2016.The monitoring and analysis methods of volatile organic compounds in the ambient air[J].Journal of Earth Environment,(2):130-139
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 4614次   下载 3250次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
环境中挥发性有机物监测及分析方法
王丽琴,李博伟,黄 宇,何世恒,薛永刚,曹军骥1,2
1.中国科学院地球环境研究所 中国科学院气溶胶化学与物理重点实验室,西安 710061;2. 西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院 地球环境科学系,西安 710049
摘要:
挥发性有机物(VOCs)是一类重要的环境污染物,严重威胁着环境和人类健康。随着VOCs问题的日趋突出,关于VOCs监测技术的研究也越来越多,检测技术逐渐完善。本文对大气中VOCs的监测技术进行了详细的综述,重点介绍了气相色谱-质谱、高效液相色谱等离线检测方法和质子转移反应质谱法在线监测方法。此外,本文分析了各种采样方法及仪器检测技术的优势与不足,旨在为大气VOCs的监测与研究起到一定的指导作用。
关键词:  VOCs  离线监测  在线监测
DOI:10.7515/JEE201602003
CSTR:32259.14.JEE201602003
分类号:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41401567,41573138)
英文基金项目:National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401567, 41573138)
The monitoring and analysis methods of volatile organic compounds in the ambient air
WANG Liqin, LI Bowei, HUANG Yu, HO Steven Sai Hang, XUE Yonggang, CAO Junji1,2
1. Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institue of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China;2. Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Abstract:
Background, aim, scope Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a series of important pollutants which have strong impacts to environment and human health. They are the direct precursors of surface ozone and secondary organic aerosol from photochemical and atmospheric reactions. There is thus an urgent need for accurate and precise measurement of VOCs. This paper reviews and compares those updated VOCs monitoring technologies. Proper parameters and conditions for sample collections and analytical methods for the widely-used off-line and on-line measurements have been discussed and proposed. Materials and methods In this study, we reviewed the achievement on VOCs sampling and analysis based on researches published in the recent decades. Results Off-line monitoring requires collection of airs into a container (e.g., canister) or onto sampling matrix (i.e., absorbent), which could be divided into non-selective and selective collection. For the non-selective air sampling, stainless steel canister and polymer bags (e.g., Tedlar or Teflon) are widely used. Selective air collection allows the target compounds to be enriched onto the absorbent by either active sampling or passive diffusion. Absorbent tube is typical media which is more convenient to be carried and offers a lower cost than the canister or sampling bag methods. In addition, the tubes can be reused at least 100 times before the absorbent to be replaced. Instrumental analysis is an important sector in the VOCs measurement. Laboratory-based capillary gas chromatography (GC) coupled with a mass spectrometry detector (MSD), flame ionization detector (FID), electron capture detector (ECD), or photoionization detector (PID) is a typical instrument to analyze either canister/sampling bag or absorbent tube loaded samples. MSD is able to detect and identify a wide range of VOCs. ECD is more sensitive on detection of halogen and nitro-compounds, while FID is suitable to measure high carbon-fraction compounds such as alkanes and alkenes. PID offers high sensitivity and fast response in characterizations of aromatic compounds (e.g., benzene). Discussion Such entire air collection has advantages on reconstructing the whole air compositions in real environment and needless of complicated operation techniques. However, few drawbacks include that the containers are too bulky to be transported and active compounds are easily lost from the inner wall. Compared with the active methods, passive air sampling methods do not require multiple equipments and units (e.g., no electricity supply is needed) and results in a low operation cost. However, the measurement can be highly interfered by external factors such as air velocity. Compare with the off-line monitoring, on-line methods avoid complicated post-sampling procedures. However, current on-line monitoring limit on detection of single or multiple compounds with high abundances only. In addition, the instruments are often costly. Conclusions Both off-line and on-line VOCs monitoring technologies have their own advantages and short-comings. Selection of a proper or combination monitoring methods is critical to achieve the goals of researches and sampling campaigns. Recommendations and perspectives Cost and operation techniques are considerations as well. All operators and technicians must be well-trained and all of the QA/QC procedures should be followed. In addition, further works on method development and advancements is necessary to obtain a more accurate, precise and sensitive measurement on VOCs.
Key words:  VOCs  off-line monitoring  on-line monitoring
您是本站第  访问者
版权所有:《地球环境学报》编辑部 陕ICP备11001760号-3
主办:中国科学院地球环境研究所 地址:西安市雁塔区雁翔路97号 邮政编码:710061
电话:029-62336252 电子邮箱:jee@ieecas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司